RRP Complete Primary Classifications & Analysis
Primary Impact to RINOS & Challengers
The primary system is the battlefield where we win or lose before the general election even starts. Closed primaries are our fortress; open systems are the enemy’s gateway. Let’s lock the gates, purge the RINOs, and take back the GOP for the people, by the people, and for America First!
RRP’s “America 1st Academy” Voter Education & Awareness Program.
Alright, patriots, let’s rip into this primary election mess with the fire and grit of the RINO Removal Project. We’re exposing the nine types of primaries—some are battlegrounds for true conservatives, others are swamps where RINOs (Republicans In Name Only) slink through. Our mission? Purge the weak, uphold the Constitution, and ensure America First warriors dominate the ballot. Here’s the breakdown, no sugarcoating, no compromise.
1. Open Primaries: The RINO Playground
What’s the Deal? Open primaries let anyone—Democrats, independents, even commies—vote in Republican primaries. It’s like letting the enemy pick your general before the war.
How It Works: Voters pick any party’s primary on election day. A registered socialist can waltz in and vote for the squishiest RINO in the GOP lineup. States like Alabama, Texas, and Virginia (15 total) use this travesty.
Why It’s a Disaster:
RINO Heaven: Liberals and independents flood the GOP primary, propping up spineless moderates who’ll bend to the left in D.C.
Strategic Sabotage: Democrats can vote for the weakest Republican, setting us up for failure in the general election.
No Loyalty: Dilutes the voice of true conservative voters who bleed red, white, and blue.
Why It’s Not All Bad: More voters might mean more energy, and a strong America First candidate can still rally the base. But let’s be real—it’s a gamble.
RINO Removal Take: Open primaries are a Trojan horse. They let outsiders hijack our party and churn out McCain clones. We need to lock this down to keep the GOP pure. Shut it down in states like Missouri and South Carolina!
2. Open to Unaffiliated Voters: Halfway to Treason
What’s the Deal? Also called semi-open, this lets independents pick GOP nominees, but registered Republicans are stuck voting in their own primary. States like Arizona, Colorado, and Maine (9 total) play this game.
How It Works: Unaffiliated voters choose which party’s primary to crash, while loyal Republicans are caged in their own. It’s like letting strangers into your house but locking your family in the basement.
Why It’s a Problem:
Independent Meddling: Unaffiliated voters, often wishy-washy centrists, can tip the scales toward RINOs who talk tough but vote soft.
Party Lockout: True conservatives can’t counterattack by voting in the Dem primary to pick a weaker opponent.
RINO Empowerment: Moderates love this system—it’s their ticket to the general election.
Any Upside? It might pull in some independent voters who lean right, but don’t hold your breath. Most are just fence-sitters who dilute our mission.
RINO Removal Take: This is a sneaky way to let outsiders mess with our primaries while pretending to keep party loyalty. Close the loopholes in New Hampshire and New Jersey—only GOP voters should pick GOP candidates!
3. Top-Two Primaries: The Establishment’s Dream
What’s the Deal? All candidates, GOP, Dem, or indie, slug it out on one ballot, and the top two go to the general election. California and Washington use this elitist setup.
How It Works: Everyone votes for anyone, and the two highest vote-getters advance, even if they’re both Democrats or both RINOs. It’s a free-for-all that screws conservatives.
Why It’s a Nightmare:
Conservative Wipeout: If multiple GOP candidates split the vote, two leftists can advance, leaving us with no real choice.
RINO Advantage: Establishment moderates appeal to a broader crowd, sidelining America First fighters.
Voter Suppression: The general election becomes a two-man show, shutting out strong conservative voices.
Any Silver Lining? A rockstar conservative could dominate the primary and general, but it’s a long shot in liberal hellholes like California.
RINO Removal Take: Top-two is a rigged game to keep conservatives down and RINOs up. It’s no wonder California loves it—perfect for their uni-party swamp. Burn this system to the ground and restore real primaries!
4. Top-Four Primaries: A Complicated Mess
What’s the Deal? Like top-two, but the top four candidates advance, often with ranked-choice voting (RCV) in the general. Alaska’s the only state dumb enough to try this.
How It Works: All candidates compete, the top four move on, and voters rank them in the general. If no majority, votes shuffle until someone wins. Sounds like a math nerd’s fever dream.
Why It’s a Problem:
Voter Confusion: Ranking candidates is too complex for most folks, leading to errors or apathy.
RINO Sneak Attack: Moderates can slip through as second or third choices, stealing wins from bold conservatives.
Liberal Bias: RCV favors candidates who play nice, not those who fight for principle.
Any Upside? It might let a dark-horse conservative advance, but the RCV nonsense usually benefits squishes who kiss up to independents.
RINO Removal Take: Alaska’s drinking the RCV Kool-Aid, and it’s a disaster. This system’s a convoluted way to dilute conservative power and prop up RINOs. Scrap it and go back to straight-up voting!
5. Partially Closed Primaries: A Step in the Right Direction
What’s the Deal? Party members vote in their own primary, but independents can pick a side. Connecticut, Idaho, and Utah (6 states) use this.
How It Works: Republicans vote GOP, Democrats vote Dem, but unaffiliated voters can jump into either primary. It’s a compromise that still smells like trouble.
Why It’s Better:
Party Loyalty: Keeps GOP voters focused on picking true conservatives, not meddling elsewhere.
Some Control: Limits cross-party sabotage by locking registered voters to their party.
Still Inclusive: Lets independents play, which might bring in some right-leaning voters.
Why It’s Not Perfect:
Independent Influence: Unaffiliated voters can still push RINOs over the finish line.
Half-Measure: Doesn’t fully protect the primary from outside interference.
RINO Removal Take: Better than open primaries, but not good enough. Independents shouldn’t have a say in GOP nominees—period. Tighten it up, North Carolina and Oklahoma!
6. Closed Primaries: The Gold Standard
What’s the Deal? Only registered Republicans vote in the GOP primary, and independents are locked out. Delaware, Florida, and New York (10 states) get it right.
How It Works: You’re either in the GOP or you’re out. No Democrats, no independents, no nonsense. Just conservative voters picking conservative candidates.
Why It’s Awesome:
RINO Killer: Only true Republicans choose nominees, ensuring America First warriors dominate.
Party Purity: Keeps the GOP focused on its values, not pandering to outsiders.
No Sabotage: Stops liberals from sneaking in to prop up weak candidates.
Any Downsides? Some say it excludes independents, but who cares? If you’re not with us, you don’t get a say. Plus, it might lower turnout, but quality beats quantity.
RINO Removal Take: Closed primaries are the way to go. Kentucky, Maryland, and Pennsylvania are holding the line—every state should follow. Lock the primaries, purge the RINOs!
7. Partially Open Primaries: Another Compromise That Fails
What’s the Deal? Voters pick a party’s primary on election day, but they’re stuck with that party’s ballot. Illinois, Indiana, and Tennessee (6 states) use this wishy-washy system.
How It Works: You choose GOP or Dem, then vote only for that party’s candidates. It’s like open primaries with a leash, but the leash is too long.
Why It’s Weak:
RINO Risk: Democrats can still crash the GOP primary to boost moderates, just like open primaries.
Strategic Voting: Liberals might pick our weakest link to face in the general.
Confusing: Voters have to commit to one party, which might trip up the less informed.
Any Upside? It’s slightly better than fully open primaries since you’re locked into one party’s ballot, but it’s still too porous.
RINO Removal Take: Partially open is just open primaries with lipstick. Iowa and Ohio need to wise up and close their primaries to keep the RINOs out. No more half-measures!
8. No Primaries: Party Bosses Rule
What’s the Deal? No primary election at all—parties pick nominees through caucuses or conventions. Louisiana’s the lone wolf here.
How It Works: Party insiders, delegates, or caucuses choose candidates. Voters get a say later in the general election, but the primary process is an elite club.
Why It’s Good:
Party Control: Keeps RINOs at bay by letting loyalists handpick nominees.
Vetting Power: Insiders can weed out weak candidates and rally behind true conservatives.
No Outsider Meddling: No liberals or independents messing with the process.
Why It’s Bad:
Voter Shutout: Regular folks have no say, which can breed resentment.
Elitism: Risks favoring connected RINOs over grassroots patriots if the wrong people run the show.
Low Engagement: Caucuses are time-intensive, so only diehards show up.
RINO Removal Take: Louisiana’s system could work if the party’s run by America First warriors, but it’s risky. We’d rather see closed primaries to balance voter input with RINO removal. Still, better than open primaries!
9. Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV): The Liberal Trap
What’s the Deal? Not a primary type, but a voting gimmick often tied to top-four primaries (looking at you, Alaska). Voters rank candidates, and votes shuffle until someone gets a majority.
How It Works: In Alaska’s top-four setup, all candidates compete, the top four advance, and voters rank them in the general. If no majority, the lowest vote-getter’s votes are redistributed. It’s a bureaucratic nightmare.
Why It’s a Scam:
RINO Paradise: Moderates thrive as second or third choices, stealing wins from bold conservatives.
Voter Confusion: Ranking is too complicated—most folks just want to pick one and go.
Liberal Darling: Leftists love RCV because it favors their “play nice” candidates who pander to everyone.
Any Upside? It might let a conservative sneak through in a crowded field, but don’t bet on it. RCV usually screws the right.
RINO Removal Take: RCV is a globalist trick to dilute conservative power. Maine and Alaska need to ditch this nonsense and go back to real voting. No rankings, no RINOs—just winners!
The Big Picture: RINOs Thrive in Weak Systems
Here’s the truth, patriots: the primary system you’ve got determines whether America First warriors or RINO sellouts make it to the ballot. Let’s break it down:
RINO Havens: Open Primaries, Open to Unaffiliated Voters, Top-Two, Top-Four, and Partially Open Primaries let outsiders—liberals, independents, or squishes—prop up moderates who’ll betray us in Washington. States like California, Michigan, and Arizona are RINO breeding grounds.
Conservative Strongholds: Closed Primaries and (sometimes) No Primaries keep the GOP pure by locking out meddlers. Florida, New York, and Louisiana are fighting the good fight.
RCV Trap: Ranked-choice voting is a sneaky way to empower RINOs while confusing voters. Alaska’s fallen for it, and we need to pull them back.
The Numbers:
15 states with Open Primaries are wide open for RINO infiltration.
10 states with Closed Primaries are our best defense against the swamp.
9 states with Open to Unaffiliated Voters and 6 with Partially Open are flirting with disaster.
2 states (California, Washington) with Top-Two and 1 (Alaska) with Top-Four are experimenting with systems that favor moderates.
Louisiana’s No Primaries could work, but it’s a gamble.
Call to Action: Purge the RINOs!
Patriots, the RINO Removal Project is sounding the alarm: our primaries are under attack! Open systems and RCV are letting liberals and moderates hijack the GOP, churning out candidates who’ll sell out to the swamp. Here’s what we do:
Demand Closed Primaries: Push every state to adopt closed primaries like Florida and Pennsylvania. Only GOP voters should pick GOP nominees. No exceptions!
Ditch RCV and Top-Four: Alaska’s experiment is a warning—complex systems empower RINOs. Simplify voting and keep it conservative.
Mobilize the Base: In open primary states like Texas and Virginia, we need every America First voter to show up and drown out the moderates.
Expose the RINOs: Call out candidates who thrive in weak systems. If they’re backed by independents or Democrats, they’re not one of us.
Spread the Word: Follow the RINO Removal Project
and the RINO Removal Project on X @RINO_Removal to stay locked and loaded for the fight.
The primary system is the battlefield where we win or lose before the general election even starts. Closed primaries are our fortress; open systems are the enemy’s gateway. Let’s lock the gates, purge the RINOs, and take back the GOP for the people, by the people, and for America First!
Alright, patriots, let’s rip into this primary election mess with the fire and grit of the RINO Removal Project. We’re exposing the nine types of primaries—some are battlegrounds for true conservatives, others are swamps where RINOs (Republicans In Name Only) slink through. Our mission? Purge the weak, uphold the Constitution, and ensure America First warriors dominate the ballot. Here’s the breakdown, no sugarcoating, no compromise.
1. Open Primaries: The RINO Playground
What’s the Deal? Open primaries let anyone—Democrats, independents, even commies—vote in Republican primaries. It’s like letting the enemy pick your general before the war.
How It Works: Voters pick any party’s primary on election day. A registered socialist can waltz in and vote for the squishiest RINO in the GOP lineup. States like Alabama, Texas, and Virginia (15 total) use this travesty.
Why It’s a Disaster:
RINO Heaven: Liberals and independents flood the GOP primary, propping up spineless moderates who’ll bend to the left in D.C.
Strategic Sabotage: Democrats can vote for the weakest Republican, setting us up for failure in the general election.
No Loyalty: Dilutes the voice of true conservative voters who bleed red, white, and blue.
Why It’s Not All Bad: More voters might mean more energy, and a strong America First candidate can still rally the base. But let’s be real—it’s a gamble.
RINO Removal Take: Open primaries are a Trojan horse. They let outsiders hijack our party and churn out McCain clones. We need to lock this down to keep the GOP pure. Shut it down in states like Missouri and South Carolina!
2. Open to Unaffiliated Voters: Halfway to Treason
What’s the Deal? Also called semi-open, this lets independents pick GOP nominees, but registered Republicans are stuck voting in their own primary. States like Arizona, Colorado, and Maine (9 total) play this game.
How It Works: Unaffiliated voters choose which party’s primary to crash, while loyal Republicans are caged in their own. It’s like letting strangers into your house but locking your family in the basement.
Why It’s a Problem:
Independent Meddling: Unaffiliated voters, often wishy-washy centrists, can tip the scales toward RINOs who talk tough but vote soft.
Party Lockout: True conservatives can’t counterattack by voting in the Dem primary to pick a weaker opponent.
RINO Empowerment: Moderates love this system—it’s their ticket to the general election.
Any Upside? It might pull in some independent voters who lean right, but don’t hold your breath. Most are just fence-sitters who dilute our mission.
RINO Removal Take: This is a sneaky way to let outsiders mess with our primaries while pretending to keep party loyalty. Close the loopholes in New Hampshire and New Jersey—only GOP voters should pick GOP candidates!
3. Top-Two Primaries: The Establishment’s Dream
What’s the Deal? All candidates, GOP, Dem, or indie, slug it out on one ballot, and the top two go to the general election. California and Washington use this elitist setup.
How It Works: Everyone votes for anyone, and the two highest vote-getters advance, even if they’re both Democrats or both RINOs. It’s a free-for-all that screws conservatives.
Why It’s a Nightmare:
Conservative Wipeout: If multiple GOP candidates split the vote, two leftists can advance, leaving us with no real choice.
RINO Advantage: Establishment moderates appeal to a broader crowd, sidelining America First fighters.
Voter Suppression: The general election becomes a two-man show, shutting out strong conservative voices.
Any Silver Lining? A rockstar conservative could dominate the primary and general, but it’s a long shot in liberal hellholes like California.
RINO Removal Take: Top-two is a rigged game to keep conservatives down and RINOs up. It’s no wonder California loves it—perfect for their uni-party swamp. Burn this system to the ground and restore real primaries!
4. Top-Four Primaries: A Complicated Mess
What’s the Deal? Like top-two, but the top four candidates advance, often with ranked-choice voting (RCV) in the general. Alaska’s the only state dumb enough to try this.
How It Works: All candidates compete, the top four move on, and voters rank them in the general. If no majority, votes shuffle until someone wins. Sounds like a math nerd’s fever dream.
Why It’s a Problem:
Voter Confusion: Ranking candidates is too complex for most folks, leading to errors or apathy.
RINO Sneak Attack: Moderates can slip through as second or third choices, stealing wins from bold conservatives.
Liberal Bias: RCV favors candidates who play nice, not those who fight for principle.
Any Upside? It might let a dark-horse conservative advance, but the RCV nonsense usually benefits squishes who kiss up to independents.
RINO Removal Take: Alaska’s drinking the RCV Kool-Aid, and it’s a disaster. This system’s a convoluted way to dilute conservative power and prop up RINOs. Scrap it and go back to straight-up voting!
5. Partially Closed Primaries: A Step in the Right Direction
What’s the Deal? Party members vote in their own primary, but independents can pick a side. Connecticut, Idaho, and Utah (6 states) use this.
How It Works: Republicans vote GOP, Democrats vote Dem, but unaffiliated voters can jump into either primary. It’s a compromise that still smells like trouble.
Why It’s Better:
Party Loyalty: Keeps GOP voters focused on picking true conservatives, not meddling elsewhere.
Some Control: Limits cross-party sabotage by locking registered voters to their party.
Still Inclusive: Lets independents play, which might bring in some right-leaning voters.
Why It’s Not Perfect:
Independent Influence: Unaffiliated voters can still push RINOs over the finish line.
Half-Measure: Doesn’t fully protect the primary from outside interference.
RINO Removal Take: Better than open primaries, but not good enough. Independents shouldn’t have a say in GOP nominees—period. Tighten it up, North Carolina and Oklahoma!
6. Closed Primaries: The Gold Standard
What’s the Deal? Only registered Republicans vote in the GOP primary, and independents are locked out. Delaware, Florida, and New York (10 states) get it right.
How It Works: You’re either in the GOP or you’re out. No Democrats, no independents, no nonsense. Just conservative voters picking conservative candidates.
Why It’s Awesome:
RINO Killer: Only true Republicans choose nominees, ensuring America First warriors dominate.
Party Purity: Keeps the GOP focused on its values, not pandering to outsiders.
No Sabotage: Stops liberals from sneaking in to prop up weak candidates.
Any Downsides? Some say it excludes independents, but who cares? If you’re not with us, you don’t get a say. Plus, it might lower turnout, but quality beats quantity.
RINO Removal Take: Closed primaries are the way to go. Kentucky, Maryland, and Pennsylvania are holding the line—every state should follow. Lock the primaries, purge the RINOs!
7. Partially Open Primaries: Another Compromise That Fails
What’s the Deal? Voters pick a party’s primary on election day, but they’re stuck with that party’s ballot. Illinois, Indiana, and Tennessee (6 states) use this wishy-washy system.
How It Works: You choose GOP or Dem, then vote only for that party’s candidates. It’s like open primaries with a leash, but the leash is too long.
Why It’s Weak:
RINO Risk: Democrats can still crash the GOP primary to boost moderates, just like open primaries.
Strategic Voting: Liberals might pick our weakest link to face in the general.
Confusing: Voters have to commit to one party, which might trip up the less informed.
Any Upside? It’s slightly better than fully open primaries since you’re locked into one party’s ballot, but it’s still too porous.
RINO Removal Take: Partially open is just open primaries with lipstick. Iowa and Ohio need to wise up and close their primaries to keep the RINOs out. No more half-measures!
8. No Primaries: Party Bosses Rule
What’s the Deal? No primary election at all—parties pick nominees through caucuses or conventions. Louisiana’s the lone wolf here.
How It Works: Party insiders, delegates, or caucuses choose candidates. Voters get a say later in the general election, but the primary process is an elite club.
Why It’s Good:
Party Control: Keeps RINOs at bay by letting loyalists handpick nominees.
Vetting Power: Insiders can weed out weak candidates and rally behind true conservatives.
No Outsider Meddling: No liberals or independents messing with the process.
Why It’s Bad:
Voter Shutout: Regular folks have no say, which can breed resentment.
Elitism: Risks favoring connected RINOs over grassroots patriots if the wrong people run the show.
Low Engagement: Caucuses are time-intensive, so only diehards show up.
RINO Removal Take: Louisiana’s system could work if the party’s run by America First warriors, but it’s risky. We’d rather see closed primaries to balance voter input with RINO removal. Still, better than open primaries!
9. Ranked-Choice Voting (RCV): The Liberal Trap
What’s the Deal? Not a primary type, but a voting gimmick often tied to top-four primaries (looking at you, Alaska). Voters rank candidates, and votes shuffle until someone gets a majority.
How It Works: In Alaska’s top-four setup, all candidates compete, the top four advance, and voters rank them in the general. If no majority, the lowest vote-getter’s votes are redistributed. It’s a bureaucratic nightmare.
Why It’s a Scam:
RINO Paradise: Moderates thrive as second or third choices, stealing wins from bold conservatives.
Voter Confusion: Ranking is too complicated—most folks just want to pick one and go.
Liberal Darling: Leftists love RCV because it favors their “play nice” candidates who pander to everyone.
Any Upside? It might let a conservative sneak through in a crowded field, but don’t bet on it. RCV usually screws the right.
RINO Removal Take: RCV is a globalist trick to dilute conservative power. Maine and Alaska need to ditch this nonsense and go back to real voting. No rankings, no RINOs—just winners!
The Big Picture: RINOs Thrive in Weak Systems
Here’s the truth, patriots: the primary system you’ve got determines whether America First warriors or RINO sellouts make it to the ballot. Let’s break it down:
RINO Havens: Open Primaries, Open to Unaffiliated Voters, Top-Two, Top-Four, and Partially Open Primaries let outsiders—liberals, independents, or squishes—prop up moderates who’ll betray us in Washington. States like California, Michigan, and Arizona are RINO breeding grounds.
Conservative Strongholds: Closed Primaries and (sometimes) No Primaries keep the GOP pure by locking out meddlers. Florida, New York, and Louisiana are fighting the good fight.
RCV Trap: Ranked-choice voting is a sneaky way to empower RINOs while confusing voters. Alaska’s fallen for it, and we need to pull them back.
The Numbers:
15 states with Open Primaries are wide open for RINO infiltration.
10 states with Closed Primaries are our best defense against the swamp.
9 states with Open to Unaffiliated Voters and 6 with Partially Open are flirting with disaster.
2 states (California, Washington) with Top-Two and 1 (Alaska) with Top-Four are experimenting with systems that favor moderates.
Louisiana’s No Primaries could work, but it’s a gamble.
Call to Action: Purge the RINOs!
Patriots, the RINO Removal Project is sounding the alarm: our primaries are under attack! Open systems and RCV are letting liberals and moderates hijack the GOP, churning out candidates who’ll sell out to the swamp. Here’s what we do:
Demand Closed Primaries: Push every state to adopt closed primaries like Florida and Pennsylvania. Only GOP voters should pick GOP nominees. No exceptions!
Ditch RCV and Top-Four: Alaska’s experiment is a warning—complex systems empower RINOs. Simplify voting and keep it conservative.
Mobilize the Base: In open primary states like Texas and Virginia, we need every America First voter to show up and drown out the moderates.
Expose the RINOs: Call out candidates who thrive in weak systems. If they’re backed by independents or Democrats, they’re not one of us.
Spread the Word: Follow the RINO Removal Project
and the RINO Removal Project on X @RINO_Removal to stay locked and loaded for the fight.
The primary system is the battlefield where we win or lose before the general election even starts. Closed primaries are our fortress; open systems are the enemy’s gateway. Let’s lock the gates, purge the RINOs, and take back the GOP for the people, by the people, and for America First!
What Our Supporters Say
“Removing RINOs from office is important because it ensures ideological purity, strengthens party unity, and maintains accountability.”
“RINO’S are the biggest obstacles to getting things accomplished under the America First agenda because they are frauds! Democrats masquerading as CONSERVATIVES! They are Uni-Party trash traitors!”
“RINOs minimize the conservative Populist agenda by supporting legislation that is too moderate or even liberal. Removing them is the only way for a stronger, more unified conservative Populist voice in Congress.”
“RINOs are the termites in the foundation of the America First movement. We must remove them to protect our values and ensure the growth of true conservative principles. They are not just obstacles; they’re betrayers of the cause. Stand firm, and let’s reclaim our party for the people.”